Last November, a few days after the Withdrawal
Treaty was published, and on the eve of British Prime Minister Theresa May travelling
to Brussels to sign it, Boris Johnson arrived in the North. He was in Belfast
to address the DUP’s annual party conference; the night after the British
Chancellor Philip Hammond attended it. Johnson entered the Crowne Plaza amid
great fanfare. The visits were a show of solidarity and plamas by English
Tories to keep the DUP on board the partnership arrangements. There was a
standing ovation and lots of photos of a beaming Boris hugging Arlene. Smiles
all around. Johnson told an enraptured DUP audience that the British government
was “on the verge of making a historic
mistake.” He told them: “We need to
junk the backstop.”
Johnson told the DUP conference exactly what it
wanted to hear. Just like Jacob Rees Mogg. In recent weeks as the debacle of a
succession of failed Westminster votes and defeats for the May government
unfolded, the Tory backbencher, and leader of the right wing European Research
Group (ERG), told every media outlet who asked that his vote on the backstop
and the Withdrawal Treaty was entirely dependent upon on the DUP. Using emotive
and divisive rhetoric Mogg claimed that the Withdrawal Treaty would leave
Britain a vassal state to the EU. He said: “It is not something I would vote for, nor is it what the British people
voted for.” In his
scathing criticism of Theresa May he accused her of giving Brussels “everything they want … It’s not so much a
vassal state anymore as a slave state.” The
DUP were delighted.
Last week it all came unstuck. Johnson and Mogg
both u-turned, abandoned their friends in the DUP and walked through the lobby
in Westminster in support of May’s Withdrawal Treaty. Could Johnson’s ambition
to be the next leader of the Conservative Party have had anything to do with
this volte-face?
Almost 100 years ago Edward Carson, the father of
Ulster Unionism, was faced with a similar betrayal. Addressing the British
House of Lords in December 1921, on the issue of the Treaty and the Partition
of Ireland, Carson was contemptuous of the British government’s willingness to
negotiate with the “Sinn Feiners”.
Carson said: “What
a fool I was. I was only a puppet, and so was Ulster, and so was Ireland, in
the political game that was to get the Conservative Party into power. And of
all the men in my experience that I think are the most loathsome it is those
who will sell their friends for the purpose of conciliating their enemies, and,
perhaps, still worse, the men who climb up a ladder into power of which even I
may have been part of a humble rung, and then, when they have got into power,
kick the ladder away without any concern for the pain, or injury, or mischief,
or damage that they do to those who have helped them to gain power”.
Carson’s words echo down through the decades as a
warning to unionist leaders that the real threat to political unionism comes
from English Tories who are prepared to betray unionists in Ireland if English interests
require it.
Thatcher – the Iron Lady - demonstrated that same calculating
approach when, in November 1985, she signed the Anglo-Irish Agreement with the
Irish government against the expressed wishes of political unionism. Ian
Paisley led tens of thousands in mass demonstrations to oppose an Agreement
that appeared to give the Irish government some sort of role in the North. It
was his “Never, Never, Never” moment. Unionists felt betrayed. But Thatcher
believed that the tokenism of the Agreement, with its objective of bolstering
the SDLP against the electoral advance of Sinn Féin, were worth it. British
interests again trumped unionist interests.
Last Friday, at two separate ‘Leave’ rallies
outside Westminster, one of which was led by two loyalist bands from Scotland
playing The Sash and other Orange songs, Ian Paisley Jnr tried to emulate his
father. He treated the crowd to ‘No
Surrender’ and claimed that: “Ahead
of us stands the sunny uplands of Freedom! Do not let any government put upon
you a Withdrawal Agreement that cuts our great nation in two”.
Almost two years ago after Theresa May’s disastrous
general election saw the Conservatives lose seats and enter into an alliance with
the DUP, I warned then that it would be a relatively short-lived experiment and
that there would be tears at the end of it. In the midst of the back-stabbing
and schisms at Westminster that is a daily feature of British news, the British
political system is now more divided than at any time in its recent history.
It is also increasingly clear with every day that
passes, and with each report that is published, that Brexit – whether hard or
soft - poses a huge threat to the two economies on this island.
Brexit threatens thousands of jobs, our farming and
agri-food industry, the human and civil rights of citizens, and the Good Friday
Agreement. In addition, the British government is using this crisis to undermine
the rights of Irish citizens living in the North - enshrined in the Good Friday
Agreement – by trying to force British citizenship on to us. This is
unacceptable. There is a huge onus on the Irish government to stand up to
British jingoism and Tory partisan policies. It must defend the rights and
entitlements of all citizens living in the North that are a fundamental part of
the architecture of the Good Friday Agreement.
At the weekend thousands turned out at a series of
events along the border, organised by the Border Communities Against Brexit, to
protest at Brexit. They were good natured protests. But there is a clear
determination on the part of the border communities not to see the clock turned
back to the days of border checkpoints and disruption of community and family
life.
There is now hardly a day passes without the issue
of a referendum on Irish Unity and of a United Ireland being part of the
discourse around Brexit. Former President Mary McAleese made a thoughtful
speech last week on this and related issues. Reunification is now a mainstream
topic. A referendum on Irish Unity will happen.
The fiasco that is Brexit, and the Tory and DUP
shambles of a response to it, have together opened up a willingness for a real
and meaningful conversation on Unity. It is an opportunity that must be grasped
and not ignored by the Irish government. The debate is happening anyway. Dublin
needs to embrace it and face the future. A united and fair future for everyone
on the island of Ireland. So, let’s prepare for the referendum”.
Comments