Brexit is a deadly serious issue. It
threatens the two economies on this island, will undermine social cohesion, and
directly attacks the Good Friday Agreement. It is within this context that the
stupidity, insanity, absurdity and ludicrousness of Brexit and of the British
government’s approach to Brexit emerges for all to see.
Take one example. Last week the
British Secretary of State for Exiting the EU Dominic Raab admitted that until
recently he did not fully understand how much of British trade relies on the
Dover to Calais crossing. This generated a flood of ironic and sarcastic
responses asking whether Raab even knew that Britain was an island? Perhaps the
most devastating and scathing critique came from Raab’s Parliamentary colleague,
former British Tory Minister Ken Clarke, who responded on twitter with, “I’ve
just given Dominic Raab an early Christmas present; a globe of the world. He
was flabbergasted at how close the rest of Europe is then asked ‘what’s the
blue stuff?’ I need a whiskey”
Meanwhile the deadlines for agreement
between Britain and the EU have been repeatedly broken amid ongoing confusion
and uncertainty. An exchange of letters last week between the DUP leader Arlene
Foster and the British Prime Minister Theresa May have given some insight into
this and into the strained relationship between the two parties.
In last week’s letter to the DUP May
acknowledges that the “unique circumstances” of the
North “could require specific alignment solutions in some scenarios” on
regulations. Arlene Foster and her party interpreted this as a
willingness by the British “to the idea of a border down the Irish
Sea”. Foster added: “The Prime Minister’s letter raises alarm bells
for those who value the integrity of our precious union and for those who want
a proper Brexit for the whole of the UK.” The DUP accused May of
breaking Tory commitments to the party.
Our precious union? Whose precious
union? A proper Brexit? The people of the North voted against Brexit. The DUP
lost that one. So now they are gonna talk tough to the Brits for letting them
down. Again.
Should anyone be surprised by this
turn of events? In June 2017 as the DUP and Conservatives were engaged in
negotiations about a confidence and supply arrangement I warned that such
dalliances always end in tears. It was a British Tory Prime Minister Ted Heath
who scrapped the Unionist regime at Stormont in 1972. It was a British Tory
Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher who signed the Anglo-Irish Agreement in 1985.
It was a Tory Prime Minister John Major who agreed the Downing Street
Declaration with the Irish government in 1993. And unionism should always
remember the words of their great hero and leader Edward Carson who remarked in
1921; "What a fool I was. I was
a puppet, so was Ulster, so was Ireland, in political game that was to get
Tories into power".
On Tuesday it was revealed that EU
and the British government negotiators had reached an agreement on dealing with
Britain’s border in Ireland. It would appear that the ‘backstop’, which is to
prevent a hard border, will involve the North and Britain remaining in a ‘temporary customs arrangement.’ It
isn’t clear what ‘temporary’ means nor what review mechanism has been agreed.
But the text will apparently include specific provisions for the North should
the ‘backstop’ fail to prevent a hard Brexit.
Will the DUP support this plan? As I
write no one knows. If I was a betting man I would say they will vote against
it. But whatever awaits the DUP, or the British PM, we can be sure about one
thing.
Brexit will be disastrous for the
North. Last week in a timely report two academics with the Canadian Company KLC
Consultants, Kurt Hubner and Renger Herman Van Nieuwkoop, produced a report
looking at the economic impact of Brexit and of Irish unity. It examined three
possible scenarios: a hard Brexit in which the North and Britain leaves the EU
single market and customs union; the North remaining in the single market and
customs union and Irish unity.
The report – ‘The Costs of
Non-Unification: Brexit and the Unification of Ireland’ – warned that
Brexit could cost the island of Ireland €42.5 billion over seven years. In a
hard Brexit the North would lose €10.1 billion. Even with a so-called soft
Brexit, in which the North remains within the single market and customs union,
the financial cost to the six counties would be enormous at €3.8 billion.
The 62-page report concluded that
between now and 2025 Irish reunification could benefit the North by almost €18
billion and the South by €5-6 billion. It concludes that unification “is
the only option with positive net effects.” It is the only long term,
sustainable solution to the decades long crisis created by partition, and the
current crisis created by the Brexit.
The reality is that Arlene Foster’s ‘precious
union’ is a narrow, intolerant place - a cold house for Irish language
speakers, women, gay and lesbian citizens and for nationalists and republicans.
We need a new union. Tone’s ‘cordial union’ which embraces self-determination
and the ideal of a real Republic and which puts the people of the island of
Ireland first. Our task as United Irelanders is to organise, mobilise,
strategise and make it happen.
Comments