In 1992 Sinn Féin held our Ard
Fheis in the Ballyfermot Community Centre. The previous year Dublin City
Council had barred us from the Mansion House and the political establishment
was united in blocking us from all municipal buildings.
It was a
historic Ard Fheis. We launched our Towards a Lasting Peace in Ireland policy
document which was the cornerstone of our peace strategy and which within three
years saw the successful opening up of the peace process.
At that
time the community centre was a ramshackle and deprived public utility. It was
so small that we had to erect and attach a marquee. The community association,
led by Vincent Jackson, were told their funding would be cut if they let us
across the door. The government and Dublin City Council were told where to go.
Last
weekend Sinn Féin was back in Ballyfermot in the Civic and Community Centre. It
is a modern, open and airy, three story building and a fitting testimony to the
hard work of the local community.
Sinn Féin
activists from across the island of Ireland were there to map out our ambitions
for Ireland over the next decade, as we continue to work towards Irish unity
and the transformation of Irish society.
Ten years ago we engaged in a
National consultation process – “Regaining the Momentum”. We set ourselves
clear goals, and agreed local programmes of work. We set ourselves two election
cycles as a timeframe.
10 years on and we are planning
for the next decade. Last weekend’s Ballyfermot meeting was about democratising
that process.
Our starting point is as a
United Ireland party. Our objectives are Irish reunification; to build an Ireland of equals; and to secure national self-determination
and political independence and sovereignty. There will not be a real republic
without a United Ireland. To achieve this we need to build our political strength and build
alliances with others. We are also for fundamental political and societal
change.
The political establishments
north and south are opposed to our objectives. The British establishment
is also opposed to the emergence of the type of Ireland we envisage. All those
interests act to thwart us.
When you add to this the task
of government in the north and the political objective of getting into
government in the south, then the challenges are significant, but not
insurmountable.
Republicans have to turn the
majority nationalist emotional commitment to reunification into an active
political commitment. We have to persuade an undefined small percentage
of unionists to that position.
One of the game changers for
Sinn Féin in pursuit of ending partition will be our influence over or
leadership of an Irish Government. By definition that means that Sinn
Féin in government in Dublin or Sinn Féin as the main opposition party. This is
a huge challenge. Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael will not easily surrender that
ground to us.
People in the 26 Counties also
need to be convinced that a United Ireland is affordable.
People in the six counties need
to be convinced that unity will work and that the loss of the subvention will
not impoverish them.
On June 23rd the
overwhelming majority of citizens in the north voted to remain within the EU.
In the aftermath of that vote I and others in Sinn Féin said that an
opportunity existed to hold and win the referendum on Irish unity contained in
the Good Friday Agreement. A series of well attended public meetings is
evidence of the popularity of this view.
Initially our position was
criticised by some of our political opponents. But in recent days that early
response has dramatically changed. At the weekend the Fianna Fail leader and
then the Taoiseach Enda Kenny came around to this position also. The SDLP has
also supported a referendum.
Last Monday I was in Stormont.
It is clear that there is widespread concern within the business community, the
voluntary and community sector, within the agriculture and tourism sectors that
Brexit will adversely impact on the North’s economy.
The Good
Friday Agreement allows for national reunification if a majority in the
North consent to that. In the context of the North being dragged out of the EU
by England there is now a greater opportunity to achieve this. The Agreement
also makes very clear that in the event of a majority of citizens opting for
reunification that the sovereign government would be obliged in this
international treaty to exercise its responsibilities and powers with rigorous
impartiality and would fully respect the “civil, political, social and
cultural rights, of freedom from discrimination for all citizens, and of parity
of esteem and of just and equal treatment for the identity, ethos, and
aspirations of both communities.”
In the time ahead more and more
people, who would have either opposed Irish unity or would have been dubious of
it, will be open to the idea of exploring new relationships on this island. To
make best use of this opportunity all of those parties on the island which
support reunification need to discuss how best this can be achieved.
There is a need to be open and
imaginative about the possible new constitutional arrangements and political
structures that might be needed. At a meeting of party leaders with the
Taoiseach I urged the Taoiseach to push ahead with an island-wide dialogue to
discuss how the remain vote in the North can be respected and what agreed
strategy can be put in place to minimise the impact of Brexit.
He agreed that an island wide
dialogue is needed. He also agreed to bring forward propositions to achieve
this.
That project needs to move
ahead speedily so that in any negotiations involving the EU and Britain and the
Irish government that the proposal for a referendum on Irish unity is on the agenda.
Comments