On
her first visit this week to the North as British Prime Minister Theresa May
met the First and Deputy First Ministers. Martin McGuinness told her that the
British have to respect the democratically expressed wishes of the people
of the North who see their future in Europe and voted to remain in Europe.
One of Mrs May’s first jobs on becoming Prime Minister
was to appoint a new Secretary of State. Jude Collins likes to refer to them as
our ‘pro-consul’ to give them their full imperial Roman title.
Believe it or not the new occupant of Hillsborough
Castle – James Brokenshire – is the nineteenth British politician to hold that
position. The first was William Whitelaw in 1972. He was appointed after the
Conservative government of Ted Heath had decided to consign the unionist regime
at Stormont to the dustbin of history. He was also the first that I met as
republicans attempted to negotiate with the British government in the summer of
that year. That’s a story for another time.
Apart from Theresa Villiers and Mo Mowlam the rest
were men. All of those I have known had different personalities. Some were
friendlier than others. Some of them were downright Machiavellian in their
machinations. But all of them were in the North to defend and promote British
national interests. These interests rarely co-incided with the interests of the
people of the North or of the island of Ireland.
They were a mixed bunch in terms of ability. Most were
distant and aloof – most were in the pockets of the generals and securocrats
and the intelligence services. I suspect some of them liked to play at being M
in James Bond.
Merlyn Rees came across as a bit of a bumbler. But it
was he who introduced the criminalisation policy and built the H-Blocks.
Roy Mason was an arrogant wee man with a Napoleonic complex
who believed that he would ‘squeeze the IRA like a tube of toothpaste.’ Under
his watch torture was routinely used in the interrogation centres in the RUC’s
Castlereagh centre, Gough Barracks in Armagh, Strand Road in Derry and other
places. It was Mason who presided over the ‘conveyor belt’ system of arrest –
torture – Diplock non-jury courts and the H-Blocks and Armagh Women’s prison.
The law became another weapon in the British arsenal to defeat republicans.
After Margaret Thatcher because British Prime Minister
in May 1979 she appointed Humphrey Atkins to the North. A local wit painted a
long graffiti question, ‘Humphrey WHO?’ on the wall at Beechmount Leisure
centre on the Falls Road. Atkins was the Secretary of State during one of the
most turbulent periods in the ‘troubles’. Under his watch the hunger strikes of
1980 and 81 occurred. He was the face of Thatcher in the media defending
British inflexibility. Those who followed him during the 1980’s were all Thatcher’s
men. In my memory one merges into the other.
The first British Secretary of State I met after 1972
was Patrick Mayhew. As British Attorney General he agreed a deal with Brian
Nelson, a British agent within the UDA, which saw charges of murder against
Nelson dropped in order to avoid embarrassing revelations about the role of the
British state in collusion. Mayhew was in the North when the media broke the
story of secret contacts between republicans and the British government. Mayhew initially denied this then he lodged a
record of the exchanges in the British Parliament in November 1993.
Embarrassingly for the British their effort to rewrite some of them was quickly
exposed.
A team of us worked overtime in the Sinn Féin office
in Turg Lodge to compile our record of these exchanges. When we published them
our version was generally accepted as the truthful account.
My first meeting with Mayhew took place in Washington
in May 1995. President Clinton had organised an economic conference to boost
the peace process. It proved impossible for the British, who had been trying to
prevent Mayhew meeting with the Sinn Féin leadership, not to agree a meeting at
the conference. It was a very surreal meeting. There was to be no coffee, tea or anything stronger. Just a quick
handshake — in private, no cameras — and a fifteen-minute meeting. Mayhew,
using a written speaking note, told us why the British government would not
allow Sinn Féin into all-party negotiations. He was visibly shaking and nervous
as he spoke, and he stuck rigidly to the text of his note, which the British
issued afterwards, almost word for word, as a public statement.
I met Mayhew
several times after that. He loosened up a wee bit but under his and John
Major’s intransigent stewardship the IRA cessation collapsed and the
opportunity for progress was stalled.
Mayhew was
followed by Mo Mowlam – an entirely different character. She is generally
fondly remembered by all of us who knew her. She was smart and funny and
willing to listen. Her battle against ill-health is well known. Her famous wig
– which she would throw on the table at the start of a conversation – was a
great device for disarming the most outraged politician at the table.
But like all of
her predecessors and successors Mo was in the North to defend British
interests. Though these changed slightly under Tony Blair she did her job. On
one occasion we discovered that the car Martin McGuinness and I were using to
attend secret meetings was bugged. It was a stupid move by the British – a
breach of good faith – and was authorised by Mo Mowlam.
But she had a
good heart. She authorised funding for Bunscoil Phobal Feirste – despite huge
resistance from within the Department of Education. She gave former British
military bases back to local communities and supported the development of the
Black and Divis mountains as a public amenity alongside numerous other little
things.
I spent my
Sunday mornings or Saturday afternoons walking the garden at Hillsborough
Castle with her and her predecessors and successors trying to get as much
progress as possible while also impressing upon them the need for an end to the
union and partition.
Those that came
after Mowlam brought their own personalities, competence and bias with them.
Whether Peter Mandelson or Peter Hain or Theresa Villiers all were first and
foremost in the North as Britain’s pro-consuls – to defend British interests on
the island of Ireland.
Before they
arrived most were also relatively unknown – certainly in Ireland. Few here had
ever heard of Francis Pym or Roy Mason or Peter Brooke. Many were never heard
of again.
And now we have
James Brokenshire. Who I hear you ask? And truth be told I don’t know. Once
again a British politician – who has no stake in this island - is given
influence over our lives by a British government whose priority interests are
not ours. And so it goes on. And so it should end.
The Brexit
referendum vote is just one more example of this. The Conservative government
in London is committed to leaving the European Union. The people of the North
rejected this. All of this is an argument for an end to the union with Britain
and for new relationships on the island of Ireland in which our priorities, or
interests are what will dictate policy.
Comments