There are countless dates in Ireland’s long struggle for freedom that
deserve commemoration and celebration but none resonate more deeply in the
Irish psyche than the Easter Rising of 1916.
One reason for this is the astonishing bravery of the women and men who
participated in it and the astonishing steadfastness and resolve of the leaders
who faced death with great courage and were executed following it. Another is
the Proclamation of the Republic and of the great principles of sovereignty, of
freedom and equality, and of civil and religious liberty that it sets out in
clear and impassioned language.
However, none of this would have occurred but for the coming together of Irish
separatists, republicans, socialists, nationalists, suffragettes, and Irish
language activists who coalesced in a great revolutionary effort to liberate
Ireland and establish a democratic and egalitarian republic on this island.
It was a transformative moment in Irish history.
It is these principles and ideals that have inspired and motivated
subsequent generations of Irish republicans. And it is these which successive Irish
governments sought to erase from the story of Easter 1916. The commemorative
Programme unveiled by the Irish government last November was widely criticised
as short term, shambolic and superficial. Public anger at its promotional video
– Ireland Inspires 2016 – was so stinging that it was withdrawn. The video failed
to mention the Rising or the Proclamation or the executed leaders. It did
however include images of David Cameron, Queen Elizabeth, Bono, and Bob Geldof.
The new
programme launched at the end of last month is a much better effort but it
still contains gaps. The government approach has been to strip away any
politics and context to the rising. To reduce it to a tragedy in which death and
injury was inflicted equally on all sides, and so all sides must be equally
remembered.
This is a shallow
and wholly self-serving approach to our history. Devoid of context or politics the
Rising is portrayed by some as a moment in history that should be kept in a
little glass case and studied; or in the view of those in the Redmondite wing
of Fine Gael an unnecessary moment of madness.
Without a
doubt war is brutal. It visits death and injury on all sides. Terrible things
are done. We have seen that in our own time during three decades of war. The
grief of a mother and father, brother and sister, or son and daughter is not
diminished by the circumstance of that loss. The grief experienced by the
family of an RUC officer, British soldier, IRA Volunteer or civilian is no
different in these times from that of those who died in the GPO or the streets of Dublin and elsewhere in 1916. All
have the right to be respected and remembered.
However it is
wrong for the state commemoration of 1916 to be reduced to solely to an act of
remembrance for a collection of individuals.
While each is
a story of individual courage and loss, those involved in the Rising were more
than a collection of individuals. They shared
an abhorrence of colonialism and imperialism and believed that Ireland’s future
must be in the hands of those of us who live on this island. Their view of the
world in which they lived was shaped by their experience of the British Empire
and the world war.
Those who took
part in the Rising gave their lives and liberty, to deliver the republic
enshrined in the proclamation. A republic built on the principles of equality
and sovereignty, of human rights and civil liberties, and of unity and nationhood. Principles that remain a challenge to successive
governments in this state.
It is these
principles that the Irish government has a problem with. For Fine Gael and
Labour it is easier to deal with the notion of individual loss and sacrifice,
than to promote the ideas of the proclamation.
So the
government does not address the inequality, division and lack of sovereignty, that
drove a generation of republicans onto the streets of Dublin. Heaven forbid
that the north is mentioned or that the continued failure that is partition is
debated.
The memory and
ownership of 1916 does not belong exclusively to Sinn Féin or any other party
or to the government. Nor can it be limited to the 26 counties. The south is
not the nation. Nor should the commemoration of the rising be limited to a
lecture, an exhibition or a parade. It belongs to all the people that share
this island and the Irish nation spread across the globe.
While the commemoration
must be an opportunity for remembrance, it is also be an opportunity for
national renewal, for building a new republic. When it has come and gone there
should be more left behind that a memory of a good day out.
That is why
Sinn Féin developed a programme of events to mark 1916. We are seeking to
encourage communities to engage with their heritage and to rise to the challenge
of delivering a republic for citizens.
The most
fitting tribute to the loss of this and past generations including republicans,
British and civilians is to deliver the republic promised on the steps of the
GPO. A 32 county republic in which citizens have equality and rights and the sovereignty
of the nation is protected.
This
generation has the opportunity and ability to deliver such a republic without
the sacrifice of previous generations. The democratic and egalitarian
principles contained in the Proclamation are as urgently required in the
Ireland of 2015, as they were 99 years ago.
Austerity
– whether imposed by a British Tory government or a Fine Gael/Labour government
- are anathema to the ideals of the Proclamation.
The
year ahead is a time for renewal and planning, a year for promoting the
republican ideals of democracy and equality. It is a time for focussing on
delivering a genuine republic for the people of this island. This includes
securing, in the time ahead, a referendum on Irish Unity so that each and every
one of us, working together, can build a new, dynamic country.
Ireland
today needs another Rising – a peaceful rising to take control of the ideals of
the Proclamation and to put them into practice.
100 years ago
in 1915 James Connolly wrote in the foreword to his pamphlet ‘The Reconquest of
Ireland’; “The conquest of Ireland had
meant the social and political servitude of the Irish masses, and therefore the
re-conquest of Ireland must mean the social as well as the political
independence from servitude of every man, woman and child in Ireland.”
Our goal
must be the reconquest of Ireland by all the people of this island.
Comments