Skip to main content

British stance hypocritical

September 7th 09

British stance hypocritical


The demand for compensation from the Libyan government for victims of IRA actions, in which it is claimed Libyan armaments were used, and the British government’s role in this, is the cause of some controversy. Interestingly little of this controversy has focused on the inappropriateness of any British government making or supporting such a demand of any other government, given Downing Street’s war crimes in Ireland.

I would certainly support compensation for all victims. This has to include the victims of British state violence and collusion.

On Monday morning I spoke to Downing Street and to the British Secretary of State Shaun Woodward about this. I told them there could be no hierarchy of victims; that all victims deserve compensation and that Mr. Brown’s position is totally inconsistent.

No one should be surprised by the hypocritical stance of successive British governments on this issue.

The role of the British state in killing citizens in Ireland in recent times is well documented.

Apart from killings by state forces British intelligence agencies also armed unionist paramilitaries, including Ulster Resistance, which was established by the DUP, and provided the information which led to countless deaths.

All of this was part of a British government directed strategy which has its roots in British involvement in other conflicts. The tactics employed in collusion were drawn from decades of British experience in fighting colonial wars elsewhere.

But it was the writings and work of Brigadier (later General Sir) Frank Kitson which refined its use in Ireland. Kitson was the British Army’s foremost expert on counter-insurgency.

He rationalised the use of the corruption of justice: ‘Everything done by a government and its agents in combating insurgency must be legitimate. But this does not mean that the government must work within exactly the same set of laws during an emergency as existed beforehand.’

In the early 1970’s the British killed Catholics and Protestants and carried out actions, including bombings, using surrogate groups.

The UDA, which remained a legal organisation for almost 20 years, and the UVF, carried out a campaign of killings against Catholics. They were supplied with information by the British intelligence agencies, including files, photographs and details of cars and movements.

One of the first people to be recruited by British intelligence was loyalist Brian Nelson a former British soldier. Two years later he was appointed the UDA’s Intelligence Officer in its West Belfast Brigade. Later in 1987 he became the UDA Senior Intelligence Officer. British intelligence helped him to update his intelligence files.

Nelson’s house and car were paid for by the British and he was given £200 a week expenses.

In the summer of 1985 Nelson was sent to apartheid South Africa.to get weapons.

To finance the trip the UDA, UVF and Ulster Resistance carried out a bank robbery on the Northern Bank in Portadown, which netted £325,000 which was then used to purchase a shipment of arms. It consisted of 200 AK47 automatic rifles, 90 Browning pistols, 500 fragmentation grenades, ammunition and 12 RPG rocket launchers.

Dick Wright, an agent for the South African arms manufacturer Armscor, offered armaments in return for missile parts or plans obtained from the huge military production plant at Shorts in East Belfast.

In October 1988 a model of the Javelin missile system was stolen from Shorts and a few months later a Blowpipe missile went missing.

In April 1989 three members of Ulster Resistance, Noel Little, James King and Samuel Quinn were arrested in Paris during a meeting with a South African Diplomat and an arms dealer.

In the three years after the South African shipment unionist paramilitaries killed 224 citizens and wounded countless scores more.

One of these was Pat Finucane, a human rights lawyer who was shot dead in February 1989 at his home in north Belfast.

In dealing with the issues of truth and victims all of these matters must be open to scrutiny. This blog has no problem with campaigns for governments to pay compensation. But that has to include the British government. Gordon Brown’s position is totally inconsistent but this is in keeping with London’s longstanding game playing on this important matter.

Another example of this is to be found in Shaun Woodward’s recent dismissal of the Eames/Bradley Commission proposal for an acknowledgement payment to all victims.

The fact is the British government is a player in all of these issues. It was one of the combatant forces in the conflict and is not and cannot be, or pretend to be, an objective or neutral referee.

Its position and Gordon Brown and Shaun Woodward’s stance flows from this reality.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Good post Gerry. For once your not waffling!lol. Get back to the basics, support the people. If we'd have wanted John Hume, we'd have voted him.
Ed Feighan said…
Hi Gerry, We both know that the Brits are masters of illusion,collusion, and deceit. They have been the oppressors of the would throughout history. The hypocrital snobs who think the world owes them what they demand. You and I will both be under ground before they give up any of their stolen wealth to the Irish for crimes they perpatrated. E.F.
Paul Doran said…
Gerry

Everyone in the North knows that the British Government committed henious crimes,All parties did.
They have a lot to answer for.

Frankly speaking I think people are fed up to their back teeth about who did what to who and
the constant calling for one enquiry after another.

It is over lets move on.

Everyone of us who was reared with the Violence are damaged in some way.Surely SF can spend their time better than these constant calls for enquiries.I see people at home who committed callous crimes against people,scum of the earth they are, but I deal with it and I have to move on.make the step and please stop this.

We have now the biggest threat against working class people in the 26 counties the Lisbon Treaty, it is a call for action and yet in Dublin where are the SF activists.SF are broke like everyone else, but people have a part to play.Get down here show yourself and spend the enxt 23 days to put a stop to this attack on workers.
Timothy Dougherty said…
hello Gerry,
British government is a player compensation the issues of truth and victims by the killings of state . The problems are the same everywhere governments have the self image as strategy. How can you judge you self? and how can there ever be a truely independent outlook the the problems the British governments have created.

Popular posts from this blog

Turf Lodge – A Proud Community

This blog attended a very special celebration earlier this week. It was Turf Lodge: 2010 Anois is Arís 50th Anniversary. For those of you who don’t know Turf Lodge is a proud Belfast working class community. Through many difficult years the people of Turf Lodge demonstrated time and time again a commitment to their families and to each other. Like Ballymurphy and Andersonstown, Turf Lodge was one of many estates that were built on the then outskirts of Belfast in the years after the end of World War 2. They were part of a programme of work by Belfast City Corporation known as the ‘Slum clearance and houses redevelopment programme.’ The land on which Turf Lodge was built was eventually bought by the Corporation in June 1956. The name of the estate, it is said, came from a farm on which the estate was built. But it was four years later, in October 1960, and after many disputes and delays between builders and the Corporation, that the first completed houses were handed over for allocation...

Slán Peter John

Sinn Féin MP Conor Murphy, Fergal Caraher’s parents, Mary and Peter John, and Sinn Féin Councillors Brendan Curran and Colman Burns at the memorial in South Armagh dedicated to Fergal Caraher It was a fine autumn morning. The South Armagh hilltops, free of British Army forts, were beautiful in the bright morning light as we drove north from Dublin to Cullyhanna to attend the funeral of Peter John Caraher. This blog has known Peter John and the Caraher family for many years. A few weeks ago his son Miceál contacted me to let me know that Peter John was terminally ill. I told him I would call. It was just before the Ard Fheis. Miceál explained to me that Peter John had been told he only had a few weeks left but had forgotten this and I needed to be mindful of that in my conversation. I was therefore a wee bit apprehensive about the visit but I called and I came away uplifted and very happy. Peter John was in great form. We spent a couple of hours craicing away, telling yarns and in his c...

The Myth Of “Shadowy Figures”

Mise agus Martin and Ted in Stormont Castle 2018 The demonising of republicans has long been an integral part of politics on this island, and especially in the lead into and during electoral campaigns. Through the decades of conflict Unionist leaders and British governments regularly posed as democrats while supporting anti-democratic laws, censorship and the denial of the rights of citizens who voted for Sinn Féin. Sinn Féin Councillors, party activists and family members were killed by unionist death squads, o ften in collusion with British state forces. Successive Irish governments embraced this demonization strategy through Section 31 and state censorship. Sinn Féin was portrayed as undemocratic and dangerous. We were denied municipal or other public buildings to hold events including Ard Fheiseanna. In the years since the Good Friday Agreement these same elements have sought to sustain this narrative. The leaderships of Fianna Fáil, the Irish Labour Party, the SDLP and...